REMEMBER HOW THE BBC REPORTED WTC7 FALL BEFORE IT HAPPENED? – INSIDE JOB
By Sean Adl-Tabatabai
Amid the growing hysteria around the impact of so-called ‘fake news,’ BBC news chief James Harding announced that the State run broadcaster would be “weighing in on the battle over lies, distortions and exaggerations,” by spending license fee money on debunking anything deemed ‘out of the ordinary’ that counters the official narrative.
A dedicated team working in the newly created “Reality check” unit will target subversive news reports from independent outlets being widely shared on social media. They will work closely with Facebook to ensure these types of news stories do not appear on users’ timelines.
“The BBC can’t edit the internet, but we won’t stand aside either,” Harding said. “We will fact check the most popular outliers on Facebook, Instagram and other social media.
“And we want Reality Check to be more than a public service, we want it to be hugely popular. We will aim to use styles and formats – online, on TV and on radio – that ensure the facts are more fascinating and grabby than the falsehoods.”
False information around big events such as the UK’s referendum on leaving the EU and the US election has been especially rife, with numerous instances of completely fabricated stories, many of which are created with the sole aim of generating advertising revenue from people viewing the stories.
Facebook has been singled out as the platform that has enabled false stories to spread most widely. Late last year the site unveiled plans to allow users to flag false stories, which would then be assessed with the help of third party fact checking organisations such as FullFact and Snopes in the US.
The BBC’s Reality Check team will focus on content that is clearly fabricated and attempting to mislead the public into thinking it has been produced by a reputable news organisation.
The decision to combat what has come to be called fake news comes at an especially sensitive time in the debate over the veracity of information online. Following reports concerning a document containing a number of serious and salacious allegations against Donald Trump, the US president-elect held a press conference in which he told a reporter from CNN “you are fake news”.
The new emphasis on tackling false information is part of the BBC’s attempt to do more “slow news”, using in-depth analysis and expertise in a bid to help the public understand an especially tumultuous period in the UK’s history.
The plans also include establishing an expertise network drawing on staff across the BBC, creating an “intelligence unit” within the World Service, which has received £290m to expand its reach into new languages, and putting more resources into data journalism.
Harding said the corporation had been inundated by news in 2016 because the world was “living in an age of instability”.
“Normal rules disrupted by low growth and high inequality; technological innovation spurring behavioural change and job insecurity; identity politics supplanting the old parties and fuelling narratives of exclusion.
“We also need to explain what’s driving the news. We need slow news, news with more depth – data, investigations, analysis, expertise – to help us explain the world we’re living in.”
King Family civil trial 10 minute video: US .01% assassinated Martin, with corporate media and political ‘leaders’ ongoing criminal co-conspirators after the fact to ‘fake news cover’ US rogue state empire killing humanity’s best, brightest, most loving
A pair of articles by the Financial Times offers quite the take on disinformation hypocrisy. Worse yet, to stop the spread of fake news, the FT editorial board wants restrictions on freedom of speech.
A pair of articles by the Financial Times offers quite the take on disinformation hypocrisy.
I suggest the Financial Times look into the mirror if it wants to understand where the problem is.
Worse yet, to stop the spread of fake news, the FT editorial board wants restrictions on freedom of speech.
Yesterday, in The Threat Posed by Putin’s Cyber Warriors the FT was so worried about “disinformation” that it proposed restrictions on freedom of speech.
“The Russian state is far from alone in using hacking as a form of espionage. What distinguishes Moscow’s activity is the malicious way it appears to be using the information garnered and disseminating fake news to further pollute the political atmosphere. The timing of leaks during the US election looked calculated to weaken Hillary Clinton, the Democratic candidate,” claims the FT editorial view.
After railing against “fake news” the editorial view went on to propose restrictions on free speech.
FT has an agenda, which it does not want to see upset, no matter how factually correct reporting may be here on the net.
It doesn’t want us “plebes” to realise the level of financial manipulation which goes into things like precious metals price suppression; the sharp, and dirty tactics done by financial institutions to foreclose homes to which they have utterly no financial or moral right; and the lavish mounds of money they throw at candidates at every level, but particularly the national level, to insure that these institutions are never, ever regulated to the full extent they should be, to prevent the continuous unethical practices in which they indulge with absolute impunity.
GLOBALISM WHAT THEY DIDN’T TELL YOU!